torsdag, juni 16

Kyotoprotokollet döms ut av svensk forskare

Lars Kamél på Department of Astronomy and Space Physics, Uppsala Universitet, dömer ut Kyotoprotokollet.

"Is climate research pseudo science? The answer is: Yes, to a large extent. There is, however, a dividing line precisely at the present time. Research about the past climate of the world is mostly science. Research about the future climate is almost entirely pseudo science." Läs mer här.

"This pseudo science is used to convince politicians that actions are needed to prevent the climate catastrophes prophesied. It has lead to the Kyoto treaty, an agreement claimed to "save" climate. In fact, it does nothing measurable to prevent climate change. Even the climate catastrophists admit this. Instead they see the Kyoto treaty as a first step. This first step should not be taken at all, because no real data from the real world indicate that the climate is need of rescue. Instead we should stop listening to them, and stop wasting money, which are used to produce even more worthless doomsday prophecies, in the form of unrealistic results from climate models. It is time to ensure that the research on future climate becomes a real science, and that resources are used to solve real problems."
Exemplen är många och kritiken bland många forskare är hård. Kyotoprotokollet kommer att kosta gigantiska belopp och detta baserat på pseudovetenskap!?

Läs Chris Landseas öppna brev varför han inte längre kan delta i IPCCs arbete.

Eller här "The Kyoto Protocol is a political solution to a non-existent problem without scientific justification."
Dr. Tomothy Ball. Canada's First Climatology Ph.D.

"If, back in the mid-nineties, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would not exist because we would have concluded it was not necessary."
Dr. Tim Patterson,
Professor of Geology, Department of Earth Sciences
Carleton University

Titta gärna på dessa videos. På engelska och mycket lärorika.

Läs om klimatmyterna.
Exempel myt 8: Global uppvärmning kommer att orsaka fler stormar och väderextremer.
Fakta: Det finns inga vetenskapliga eller statistiska belägg överhuvudtaget för detta påstående.

Ursäkta all engelska - vill bara föra fram andra åsikter än de politiskt korrekta. Och det finns många. Parallellen till "genusforskningen" är oundviklig.